↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the inter and intraobserver reproducibility of the “defect coverage index method”, a new computed tomography assessment method of sagittal graft positioning in arthroscopic bone block…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of the inter and intraobserver reproducibility of the “defect coverage index method”, a new computed tomography assessment method of sagittal graft positioning in arthroscopic bone block procedures
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40634-023-00590-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Delgado, Ignacio De Rus, Pablo Cañete, Jorge Díaz, Raquel Ruiz, Miguel García Navlet, Miguel Ángel Ruiz Ibán

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#18,936,064
of 24,132,754 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#256
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,861
of 404,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,132,754 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.