| Title |
The crown-root morphology of central incisors in different skeletal malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Orthodontics, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40510-019-0272-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiao-ming Wang, Ling-zhi Ma, Jing Wang, Hui Xue |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 45% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#54
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,164
of 364,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them