↓ Skip to main content

Parallel solutions of static Hamilton-Jacobi equations for simulations of geological folds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematics in Industry, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Parallel solutions of static Hamilton-Jacobi equations for simulations of geological folds
Published in
Journal of Mathematics in Industry, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/2190-5983-4-10
Authors

Tor Gillberg, Are Magnus Bruaset, Øyvind Hjelle, Mohammed Sourouri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 8%
Norway 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 46%
Engineering 3 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematics in Industry
#10
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,263
of 240,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematics in Industry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one scored the same or higher as 34 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them