| Title |
Correction of scan time dependence of standard uptake values in oncological PET
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EJNMMI Research, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2191-219x-4-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jörg van den Hoff, Alexandr Lougovski, Georg Schramm, Jens Maus, Liane Oehme, Jan Petr, Bettina Beuthien-Baumann, Jörg Kotzerke, Frank Hofheinz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 52% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#174
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,579
of 238,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them