| Title |
Aerosol therapy in adult critically ill patients: a consensus statement regarding aerosol administration strategies during various modes of respiratory support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-023-01147-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Li, Kai Liu, Shan Lyu, Guoqiang Jing, Bing Dai, Rajiv Dhand, Hui-Ling Lin, Paolo Pelosi, Ariel Berlinski, Jordi Rello, Antoni Torres, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Jean-Bernard Michotte, Qin Lu, Gregory Reychler, Laurent Vecellio, Armèle Dornelas de Andrade, Jean-Jacques Rouby, James B. Fink, Stephan Ehrmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 11 | 12% |
| Spain | 8 | 9% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Argentina | 4 | 4% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 41 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 9% |
| Scientists | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#653,963
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#62
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,902
of 369,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.