↓ Skip to main content

Using grounded theory to validate Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) strategic competence in EFL graph-writing

Overview of attention for article published in Language Testing in Asia, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Using grounded theory to validate Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) strategic competence in EFL graph-writing
Published in
Language Testing in Asia, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40468-016-0031-y
Authors

Fereshteh Tadayon, Hamdollah Ravand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Lecturer 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 25 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 10 20%
Arts and Humanities 6 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 27 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,021,919
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Language Testing in Asia
#67
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,938
of 420,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Testing in Asia
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.