@FattebertJ This has been looked at…https://t.co/lDrWPnCzH7
@Dr_Wintermute @ElsaWidding @YouTube McKittrick's anekdot får även stöd i reviewad forskning om publication bias inom klimatforskning. https://t.co/5pKUYdZWEj
@magister_martin @ElsaWidding @jrockstrom Jag har inte läst EWs bok Klimatkarusellen, men som jag förstår det tar hon upp Rockström där. Antar att hon faktiskt lyssnat på honom. Ja, confirmation bias är mycket vanligt i klimatdebatten, och publication bia
@c_lerno @positivtladdad @MattiasHellore @MEDClementz Bra också att erkänna att det finns en hel del cherry picking även från andra. Titeln till trots, finner denna studie tydlig bias mot att överdriva effekter i abstract, samt att större effekter premier
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLoq5Y4
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
@JuhaItkonen @OlliKarkkainen Meta-analyysi: tiivistelmissä esitetään paljon suurempia tuloksia kuin artikkeliteksteissä, etenkin huippulehdissä (merkitsevä). Sensaatiohakuisia klikkitiivistelmiä! Sen sijaan muiden meta-analyysien löytämä julkaisuvinouma on
RT @debunkdenialism: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
RT @debunkdenialism: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
RT @debunkdenialism: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
@jespet71 @Ericson_ubbhult Vilka riktiga klimatforskare säger att människan inte påverkar klimatet? Vad säger du om den här granskningen? Forskarna vid Lunds universitet är och vänster och elit? https://t.co/KgWx31fszE
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
RT @debunkdenialism: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
@fcmfcs2019 So articles have thede things called hyperlinks which can bring you to other sites... And none of your IPCC qoutes demonstrate bias https://t.co/EnBYzdZzuk
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
@SeppalaVille Yleensä eniten näkyvyyttä saavat tuollaiset ääritulokset (jopa huipputiedelehdissä, meta-analyysin mukaan, ja toisen mukaan lisäksi ne esitetään tiivistelmissä ja matalat piilotetaan teknisiin osioihin). Klikkiotsikointia. Populaarilehdistä p
@MVirtanen @pasijm @powerlineUS Kannattaa säästää paukkunsa ja uskottavuutensa muuhun kuin noin laajan tieteen konsensuksen vastustamiseen. Tutkimusten keskiarvo on samansuuntainen kuin kirkuvat lehtiotsikot mutta paljon maltillisempi. Tiedelehtien abstrak
Meta-analyysi: tiivistelmissä esitetään paljon suurempi tuloksia kuin artikkeliteksteissä, etenkin huippulehdissä (merkitsevä). Sensaatiohakuisia klikkitiivistelmiä! Sen sijaan monen muun meta-analyysin löytämä julkaisuvinouma ehkä vain huippulehdissä. htt
@CogentThe @davidhogg111 And there is no statistical evidence of bias. https://t.co/37EIjpcbxk If you don't know what statistics is, I have ten minutes to school you on this topic too.
RT @debunkdenialism: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
@gringocranko @Nebosa @Champagnesocia6 800 forskare i FN:s klimatpanel. Samt 97-98% av 1372st klimatforskare (granskades av Stanford Unv 2010) överens IPCC:s huvudbudskap. https://t.co/yd3DrHFdXV 2017 analyserades 1100 klimarapporter av Lunds Unv (inga b
@TobiasSund @Krakel_ De länkar också till en studie från Lunds universitet 2016 som kontrollerat 1100 studier och inte hittat några bevis till partisk rapportering: https://t.co/O83ZTvhcWT
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science. https://t.co/hS2wLopy8w
@mcsetty @unclebobmartin @JFerrero @DomBurf The cited article in that post: https://t.co/L8EwWoQeTk Gonna take some time to read through it.
Maybe no #publicationbias in climate science, but seems to be some journal related presentation bias. https://t.co/iQBLC1QCm5 #metascience https://t.co/t3BLV0EXaM
@KirkegaardEmil I only know this about publication bias https://t.co/2GrncHDhQF no analysis on statistical power or similar
@ockhams In circles we go: maar mijn pogingen ten spijt om ook maar 1 wetenschappelijk argument of bron uit u te krijgen, zal ik het wel wetenschappelijk houden. Aub, de confirmation bias voor u: https://t.co/xkR1ud32Ey
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @WilliamMeservy: A meta-analysis of #climatechange studies finds "no evidence of publication bias in climate change #science" https://t.…
RT @WilliamMeservy: A meta-analysis of #climatechange studies finds "no evidence of publication bias in climate change #science" https://t.…
A meta-analysis of #climatechange studies finds "no evidence of publication bias in climate change #science" https://t.co/dk3Cg1RySJ
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
No evidence of misinformation on peer reviewed climate change research https://t.co/uNY1n6k9Dy
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
n times more for the people in the back https://t.co/dds6wx01fi
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co…
Study reviews 1,154 climate science results, finds no evidence of publication bias. https://t.co/jce0oJU2HV https://t.co/4UIf6fE2Hq
'No evidence of publication bias in climate change' science'https://t.co/ScI9wcDhz8
RT @mark_lynas: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science, says new paper: https://t.co/d8A91IzTBL
RT @SilverVVulpes: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/2GrncHDhQF
RT @mark_lynas: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science, says new paper: https://t.co/d8A91IzTBL
RT @SilverVVulpes: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/2GrncHDhQF
RT @SilverVVulpes: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/2GrncHDhQF
RT @shirvill: Study of 1154 experimental results from 120 articles finds no evidence of publication bias in #ClimateChange science https://…
Study of 1154 experimental results from 120 articles finds no evidence of publication bias in #ClimateChange science https://t.co/DuXWZtmoIO
RT @SilverVVulpes: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/2GrncHDhQF
RT @mark_lynas: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science, says new paper: https://t.co/d8A91IzTBL
RT @RogerHelmerMEP: None so blind....... https://t.co/o5lD5myUxQ
None so blind....... https://t.co/o5lD5myUxQ
Academic paper cites sceptics David Holland and Craig Idso @co2science as evidence for consensus of man-made warming https://t.co/alzzOuNO00 https://t.co/SL90hQRIZa
RT @mark_lynas: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science, says new paper: https://t.co/d8A91IzTBL
«No evidence of publication bias in climate change science» (!), aunque otros sesgos (ej. abstracts 'exagerados' y más en alto impacto) https://t.co/Tdn3FnP0CW
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/2GrncHDhQF
RT @arjundevamar: What an important paper at this time! #climatechange No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.…
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science, says new paper: https://t.co/d8A91IzTBL
RT @arjundevamar: What an important paper at this time! #climatechange No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.…
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/wU8ymsXFRL
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/46lRSGNJUV
RT @EcographyJourna: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/DPzg95zQr1 #climatechange #science #ScienceMarc…
RT @EcographyJourna: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/DPzg95zQr1 #climatechange #science #ScienceMarc…
No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/A4paeSvUrB https://t.co/qBBxTZ6THT
RT @EcographyJourna: No evidence of publication bias in climate change science https://t.co/DPzg95zQr1 #climatechange #science #ScienceMarc…
"No evidence of publication bias" in #climatescience. https://t.co/7RcFmP8u8n https://t.co/rH1hCs9zCt
RT @BrianNosek: Climatic Change: "No evidence of publication bias in climate change science" https://t.co/iLiHg9OC8Z
RT @BrianNosek: Climatic Change: "No evidence of publication bias in climate change science" https://t.co/iLiHg9OC8Z