↓ Skip to main content

Thermodiffusion effects on magneto-nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet

Overview of attention for article published in Boundary Value Problems, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Thermodiffusion effects on magneto-nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet
Published in
Boundary Value Problems, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1687-2770-2013-136
Authors

Faiz G Awad, Precious Sibanda, Ahmed A Khidir

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 5%
India 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 47%
Researcher 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 12 63%
Engineering 2 11%
Materials Science 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Boundary Value Problems
#57
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,758
of 207,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boundary Value Problems
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.