↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of lung tumor types based on protein attributes by machine learning algorithms

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Prediction of lung tumor types based on protein attributes by machine learning algorithms
Published in
SpringerPlus, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faezeh Hosseinzadeh, Amir Hossein KayvanJoo, Mansuor Ebrahimi, Bahram Goliaei

Abstract

Early diagnosis of lung cancers and distinction between the tumor types (Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) are very important to increase the survival rate of patients. Herein, we propose a diagnostic system based on sequence-derived structural and physicochemical attributes of proteins that involved in both types of tumors via feature extraction, feature selection and prediction models. 1497 proteins attributes computed and important features selected by 12 attribute weighting models and finally machine learning models consist of seven SVM models, three ANN models and two NB models applied on original database and newly created ones from attribute weighting models; models accuracies calculated through 10-fold cross and wrapper validation (just for SVM algorithms). In line with our previous findings, dipeptide composition, autocorrelation and distribution descriptor were the most important protein features selected by bioinformatics tools. The algorithms performances in lung cancer tumor type prediction increased when they applied on datasets created by attribute weighting models rather than original dataset. Wrapper-Validation performed better than X-Validation; the best cancer type prediction resulted from SVM and SVM Linear models (82%). The best accuracy of ANN gained when Neural Net model applied on SVM dataset (88%). This is the first report suggesting that the combination of protein features and attribute weighting models with machine learning algorithms can be effectively used to predict the type of lung cancer tumors (SCLC and NSCLC).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 19%
Computer Science 10 16%
Engineering 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,194,150
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,461
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,268
of 195,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#66
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.