↓ Skip to main content

Long loop technique with bifemoral access as salvage technique for repositioning of dislodged port catheters

Overview of attention for article published in CVIR Endovascular, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Long loop technique with bifemoral access as salvage technique for repositioning of dislodged port catheters
Published in
CVIR Endovascular, December 2022
DOI 10.1186/s42155-022-00341-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent Van den Bosch, Frédéric De Beukelaer, Peter Isfort, Sebastian Keil, Christiane K. Kuhl, Philipp Bruners, Federico Pedersoli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#14,552,733
of 23,915,168 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#209
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,888
of 443,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,915,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.