↓ Skip to main content

Anesthetic management for withdrawal from a right ventricular assist device and Fontan procedure in a patient with an implantable left ventricular assist device for fulminant cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in JA Clinical Reports, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 217)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
Title
Anesthetic management for withdrawal from a right ventricular assist device and Fontan procedure in a patient with an implantable left ventricular assist device for fulminant cardiomyopathy
Published in
JA Clinical Reports, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40981-023-00620-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naka Kida, Masahiro Morinaga, Naoki Tadokoro, Takuma Maeda, Yoshihiko Onishi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2023.
All research outputs
#14,957,747
of 25,051,161 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#41
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,054
of 374,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,051,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.