Title |
Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Translational Medicine, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2001-1326-2-10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William T Riley, Russell E Glasgow, Lynn Etheredge, Amy P Abernethy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 23 | 41% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
Australia | 4 | 7% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 54% |
Scientists | 19 | 34% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
United States | 4 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 244 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 55 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 18% |
Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 8% |
Professor | 15 | 6% |
Other | 39 | 15% |
Unknown | 41 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 33 | 13% |
Psychology | 29 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 9% |
Computer Science | 14 | 5% |
Other | 40 | 16% |
Unknown | 57 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,107,566
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#39
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,393
of 207,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them