↓ Skip to main content

Embracing critical thinking to enhance our practice

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Embracing critical thinking to enhance our practice
Published in
Insights into Imaging, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13244-023-01435-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Martí-Bonmatí

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#15,359,006
of 24,350,163 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#646
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,405
of 366,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#20
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,350,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.