↓ Skip to main content

False-positive Legionella pneumophila antibodies in COVID-19 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
Title
False-positive Legionella pneumophila antibodies in COVID-19 patients
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40635-023-00512-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu-hua He, Shan Li, Li Weng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,427,393
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#67
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,823
of 394,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.