| Title |
How to improve the efficiency and the safety of real-time ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in 2023: a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-023-01141-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Boulet, Laurent Muller, Claire M Rickard, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Claire Roger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 513 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 73 | 14% |
| Spain | 30 | 6% |
| United States | 17 | 3% |
| Colombia | 17 | 3% |
| Peru | 13 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 12 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 10 | 2% |
| India | 8 | 2% |
| Chile | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 77 | 15% |
| Unknown | 248 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 456 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 39 | 8% |
| Scientists | 13 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 327. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#104,480
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#8
of 1,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,503
of 394,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.