Title |
Exploring the effects of increasing underutilized crops on consumers’ diets: the case of millet in Uganda
|
---|---|
Published in |
Agricultural and Food Economics, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40100-021-00206-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cesar Revoredo-Giha, Luiza Toma, Faical Akaichi, Ian Dawson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 26 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,973,209
of 23,989,432 outputs
Outputs from Agricultural and Food Economics
#46
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,065
of 505,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agricultural and Food Economics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.