| Title |
Saudi Critical Care Society clinical practice guidelines on the prevention of venous thromboembolism in adults with trauma: reviewed for evidence-based integrity and endorsed by the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-023-01135-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marwa Amer, Mohammed S. Alshahrani, Yaseen M. Arabi, Ahmed Al-jedai, Hassan M. Alshaqaq, Abdulaziz Al-Sharydah, Faisal A. Al-Suwaidan, Hosam Aljehani, Thamer Nouh, Hassan Mashbari, Nehal Tarazan, Saad Alqahtani, Wail Tashkandi, Khalid Maghrabi, Muneerah Albugami, Samaher Hashim, Norah M. Alsubaie, Mohammad Alsenani, Haifa Algethamy, Thamir M. Alshammari, Ali Alaklabi, Nadia Ismail, Esraa S. Altawil, Alyaa Elhazmi, Ahmed Nahhas, Maha Aljuaid, Naif Alsadoon, Yasser Binbraik, Yuhong Yuan, Waleed Alhazzani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 162 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 18 | 11% |
| Mexico | 14 | 9% |
| Colombia | 9 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 9 | 6% |
| Japan | 7 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 4% |
| Guatemala | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Congo | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 82 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 138 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 12% |
| Scientists | 4 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#409,215
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#38
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,284
of 404,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.