↓ Skip to main content

Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries: a classification proposal

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries: a classification proposal
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s10195-023-00695-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Lavorato, Gelsomina Aruta, Raffaele De Marco, Pietro Zeppa, Paolo Titolo, Michele Rosario Colonna, Mariarosaria Galeano, Alfio Luca Costa, Francesca Vincitorio, Diego Garbossa, Bruno Battiston

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) include several conditions in which one or more peripheral nerves are damaged. Trauma is one of the most common causes of PNIs and young people are particularly affected. They have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and on the healthcare system, while timing and type of surgical treatment are of the utmost importance to guarantee the most favorable functional recovery. To date, several different classifications of PNIs have been proposed, most of them focusing on just one or few aspects of these complex conditions, such as type of injury, anatomic situation, or prognostic factors. Current classifications do not enable us to have a complete view of this pathology, which includes diagnosis, treatment choice, and possible outcomes. This fragmentation sometimes leads to an ambiguous definition of PNIs and the impossibility of exchanging crucial information between different physicians and healthcare structures, which can create confusion in the choice of therapeutic strategies and timing of surgery. The authors retrospectively analyzed a group of 24 patients treated in their center and applied a new classification for PNI injuries. They chose (a) five injury-related factors, namely nerve involved, lesion site, nerve type (whether motor, sensory or mixed), surrounding tissues (whether soft tissues were involved or not), and lesion type-whether partial/in continuity or complete. An alphanumeric code was applied to each of these classes, and (b) four prognostic codes, related to age, timing, techniques, and comorbidities. An alphanumeric code was produced, similar to that used in the AO classification of fractures. The authors propose this novel classification for PNIs, with the main advantage to allow physicians to easily understand the characteristics of nerve lesions, severity, possibility of spontaneous recovery, onset of early complications, need for surgical treatment, and the best surgical approach. according to the Oxford 2011 level of evidence, level 2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 18%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Unknown 15 68%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 15 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#127
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,290
of 400,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.