↓ Skip to main content

Reduced turnover rate of topsoil organic carbon in old-growth forests: a case study in subtropical China

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Ecosystems, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Reduced turnover rate of topsoil organic carbon in old-growth forests: a case study in subtropical China
Published in
Forest Ecosystems, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40663-021-00337-5
Authors

Xin Xiong, Juxiu Liu, Guoyi Zhou, Qi Deng, Huiling Zhang, Guowei Chu, Ze Meng, Deqiang Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Researcher 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#123
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,995
of 433,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.