↓ Skip to main content

Hoffa’s fat pad abnormalities, knee pain and magnetic resonance imaging in daily practice

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Hoffa’s fat pad abnormalities, knee pain and magnetic resonance imaging in daily practice
Published in
Insights into Imaging, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13244-016-0483-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Draghi, G. Ferrozzi, L. Urciuoli, C. Bortolotto, S. Bianchi

Abstract

Hoffa's (infrapatellar) fat pad (HFP) is one of the knee fat pads interposed between the joint capsule and the synovium. Located posterior to patellar tendon and anterior to the capsule, the HFP is richly innervated and, therefore, one of the sources of anterior knee pain. Repetitive local microtraumas, impingement, and surgery causing local bleeding and inflammation are the most frequent causes of HFP pain and can lead to a variety of arthrofibrotic lesions. In addition, the HFP may be secondarily involved to menisci and ligaments disorders, injuries of the patellar tendon and synovial disorders. Patients with oedema or abnormalities of the HFP on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are often symptomatic; however, these changes can also be seen in asymptomatic patients. Radiologists should be cautious in emphasising abnormalities of HFP since they do not always cause pain and/or difficulty in walking and, therefore, do not require therapy. Teaching Points • Hoffa's fat pad (HFP) is richly innervated and, therefore, a source of anterior knee pain. • HFP disorders are related to traumas, involvement from adjacent disorders and masses. • Patients with abnormalities of the HFP on MRI are often but not always symptomatic. • Radiologists should be cautious in emphasising abnormalities of HFP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 164 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Other 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Master 15 9%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Engineering 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 53 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,283,004
of 25,503,365 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#113
of 1,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,025
of 313,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,503,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.