| Title |
Research priorities for therapeutic plasma exchange in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-023-00510-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sascha David, Lene Russell, Pedro Castro, Andry van de Louw, Lara Zafrani, Tasneem Pirani, Nathan D. Nielsen, Eric Mariotte, Bruno L. Ferreyro, Jan T. Kielstein, Luca Montini, Anne C. Brignier, Matthias Kochanek, Joan Cid, Chiara Robba, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Marlies Ostermann, Nicole P. Juffermans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 11% |
| Colombia | 1 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,317,366
of 25,129,395 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#151
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,727
of 388,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,129,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.