↓ Skip to main content

Reconciling Carbon-cycle Concepts, Terminology, and Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
929 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1533 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Reconciling Carbon-cycle Concepts, Terminology, and Methods
Published in
Ecosystems, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0105-7
Authors

F. S. Chapin, G. M. Woodwell, J. T. Randerson, E. B. Rastetter, G. M. Lovett, D. D. Baldocchi, D. A. Clark, M. E. Harmon, D. S. Schimel, R. Valentini, C. Wirth, J. D. Aber, J. J. Cole, M. L. Goulden, J. W. Harden, M. Heimann, R. W. Howarth, P. A. Matson, A. D. McGuire, J. M. Melillo, H. A. Mooney, J. C. Neff, R. A. Houghton, M. L. Pace, M. G. Ryan, S. W. Running, O. E. Sala, W. H. Schlesinger, E.-D. Schulze

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 30 2%
Spain 9 <1%
Brazil 8 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Mexico 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
France 4 <1%
Other 22 1%
Unknown 1430 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 336 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 322 21%
Student > Master 212 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 90 6%
Professor 88 6%
Other 261 17%
Unknown 224 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 545 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 370 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 205 13%
Engineering 32 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 <1%
Other 58 4%
Unknown 314 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2024.
All research outputs
#6,981,937
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#604
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,199
of 171,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.