↓ Skip to main content

Reconciling Carbon-cycle Concepts, Terminology, and Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
556 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1091 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Reconciling Carbon-cycle Concepts, Terminology, and Methods
Published in
Ecosystems, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0105-7
Authors

F. S. Chapin, G. M. Woodwell, J. T. Randerson, E. B. Rastetter, G. M. Lovett, D. D. Baldocchi, D. A. Clark, M. E. Harmon, D. S. Schimel, R. Valentini, C. Wirth, J. D. Aber, J. J. Cole, M. L. Goulden, J. W. Harden, M. Heimann, R. W. Howarth, P. A. Matson, A. D. McGuire, J. M. Melillo, H. A. Mooney, J. C. Neff, R. A. Houghton, M. L. Pace, M. G. Ryan, S. W. Running, O. E. Sala, W. H. Schlesinger, E.-D. Schulze

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,091 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 31 3%
Brazil 10 <1%
Spain 10 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Mexico 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Other 22 2%
Unknown 985 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 270 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 262 24%
Student > Master 162 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 85 8%
Professor 76 7%
Other 236 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 441 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 303 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 169 15%
Unspecified 124 11%
Engineering 20 2%
Other 34 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,347,739
of 7,876,706 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#341
of 573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,592
of 120,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,876,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 56th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.