| Title |
Patient and clinician-reported experiences of using electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) as part of routine cancer care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-023-00544-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amelia Payne, Ashley Horne, Neil Bayman, Fiona Blackhall, Layla Bostock, Clara Chan, Joanna Coote, Marie Eaton, Jacqueline Fenemore, Fabio Gomes, Emma Halkyard, Margaret Harris, Colin Lindsay, Delyth McEntee, Hilary Neal, Laura Pemberton, Hamid Sheikh, David Woolf, James Price, Janelle Yorke, Corinne Faivre-Finn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,454,012
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#30
of 539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,435
of 240,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.