| Title |
Expert consensus statement on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ECMO for COVID-19 severe ARDS: an international Delphi study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-023-01126-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed A. Rabie, Alyaa Elhazmi, Mohamed H. Azzam, Akram Abdelbary, Ahmed Labib, Alain Combes, Bishoy Zakhary, Graeme MacLaren, Ryan P. Barbaro, Giles J. Peek, Marta Velia Antonini, Kiran Shekar, Abdulrahman Al‐Fares, Pranay Oza, Yatin Mehta, Huda Alfoudri, Kollengode Ramanathan, Mark Ogino, Lakshmi Raman, Matthew Paden, Daniel Brodie, Robert Bartlett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Singapore | 2 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#932,054
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#100
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,762
of 410,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.