↓ Skip to main content

Long-term effectiveness of steroid injections and splinting in mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Long-term effectiveness of steroid injections and splinting in mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome
Published in
Neurological Sciences, June 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10072-004-0229-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Sevim, O. Dogu, H. �amdeviren, H. Kaleagasi, M. Aral, E. Arslan, A. Milcan

Abstract

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of non-surgical treatment methods for mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome, 120 patients with clinical symptoms and electrophysiologic evidence were included in a prospective, randomized and blinded trial: 60 patients were instructed to wear splints every night, 30 received injections of betamethasone 4 cm proximal to the carpal tunnel, and 30 received injections distal to the carpal tunnel. After approximately 1 year (mean, 11 months; range, 9-14), 108 patients were available for final evaluation. We assessed clinical symptom severity and performed detailed electrophysiologic examinations before and after treatment. Splinting provided symptomatic relief and improved sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities at the long-term follow-up when the splints were worn almost every night. Proximal and distal injections of steroids were ineffective on the basis of both clinical symptoms and electrophysiologic findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Professor 5 7%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,959,052
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Sciences
#6
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,421
of 62,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them