Title |
Comparison of cardiac index measurements in intensive care patients using continuous wave vs. pulsed wave echo-Doppler compared to pulse contour cardiac output
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40635-023-00499-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Prashant Parulekar, James Powys-Lybbe, Paul Bassett, Seb Roques, Mark Snazelle, Gemma Millen, Tim Harris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
Ireland | 2 | 7% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
Kazakhstan | 1 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,543,111
of 24,719,968 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#30
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,660
of 393,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,719,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.