| Title |
Patient preferences for HIV/AIDS therapy - a discrete choice experiment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2191-1991-3-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Axel C Mühlbacher, Matthias Stoll, Jörg Mahlich, Matthias Nübling |
| Abstract |
An increasing emphasis on patient-centred health care and shared decision making requires an intensive consideration of patient preferences. In the present study, patient preferences regarding treatment of HIV/AIDS were explored using direct assessment and discrete choice experiment (DCE). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,135,539
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#120
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,349
of 206,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.