| Title |
Developing the ethics of implementation research in health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-016-0527-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vijayaprasad Gopichandran, Valerie A. Luyckx, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Amy Fairchild, Jerome Singh, Nhan Tran, Abha Saxena, Pascal Launois, Andreas Reis, Dermot Maher, Mahnaz Vahedi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Zambia | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 55% |
| Scientists | 9 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Researcher | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 12% |
| Psychology | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 61 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,714,489
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#309
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,272
of 426,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.