↓ Skip to main content

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery via bilateral thoracotomy in treatment of left ventricle aneurysm: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Minimally invasive cardiac surgery via bilateral thoracotomy in treatment of left ventricle aneurysm: a case report
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, April 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40792-023-01640-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuta Kanazawa, Shunsuke Saito, Ikuko Shibasaki, Taiki Matsuoka, Shotaro Hirota, Shouhei Yokoyama, Yasuyuki Kanno, Masahiro Tezuka, Go Tsuchiya, Taisuke Konishi, Koji Ogata, Hirotsugu Fukuda

Abstract

Left ventricle aneurysm (LVA) as a sequela to myocardial infarction or iatrogenic injury is required surgical treatment with full median sternotomy. Herein, we report a case of successful surgical treatment of left ventricle aneurysm performed by minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). We describe a case of a LVA treated by minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an 82-year-old woman who reported to the hospital with the complaint of chest pains at rest. Computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography revealed a left ventricle apical aneurysm. The aneurysm was suspected to be a pseudoaneurysm caused by a previous myocardial infarction. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia, with the patient in a supine position. A small incision was made in the 3rd intercostal space through which an aortic root vent cannula and aortic clamp were inserted, followed by exposing the aneurysm via incision of the left 6th intercostal space. The aneurysm was resected and pathologically examined, revealing it to be a "true" aneurysm. The left ventricle wall was closed using polypropene mattress sutures. Postoperative CT scan revealed successful resection of the aneurysm. Usually, a surgical treatment with full median sternotomy and left ventriculostomy is indicated for LVA. We decided to treat the LVA with bilateral thoracotomy MICS. We preferred to perform this procedure under cardiac arrest to ensure safe and secure closure of the aneurysm. The right small thoracotomy was necessary for aortic cross-clamping and aortic root venting. The procedure was safe and simple and yielded excellent postoperative outcomes. Therefore, we speculate that this method can be applied to the management of larger aneurysms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,863,447
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#93
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,550
of 250,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.