@autogynephilic @BlanchardPhD (note: the above is my draft, but its points have already been made in a peer-reviewed commentary by Italiano [https://t.co/1kURxZjdOO], which critiqued a fallacious argument by Cantor. But Cantor's reply misunderstood them; m
@KurtosisEnjoyer @LinkofSunshine he is not "doing good research" here, he cherry picked two studies that are not even studying the brain in the same way and falsely saying they studied HSTS/AGP people when they did not use Blanchardian classification to pi
@OuroborosSouth @wil_da_beast630 @ImWatson91 Blanchard stuff on MRI is debated rather intensely https://t.co/zS2DsnRbMB But for the purpose of this discussion, whatever, one more (particularly dubious/debated) drop in the "trans is neurogenic" bucket