↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of techniques to improve a deep learning algorithm for the automatic detection of intracranial haemorrhage on CT head imaging

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology Experimental, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of techniques to improve a deep learning algorithm for the automatic detection of intracranial haemorrhage on CT head imaging
Published in
European Radiology Experimental, April 2023
DOI 10.1186/s41747-023-00330-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa Yeo, Bahman Tahayori, Hong Kuan Kok, Julian Maingard, Numan Kutaiba, Jeremy Russell, Vincent Thijs, Ashu Jhamb, Ronil V. Chandra, Mark Brooks, Christen D. Barras, Hamed Asadi

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) algorithms are playing an increasing role in automatic medical image analysis. To evaluate the performance of a DL model for the automatic detection of intracranial haemorrhage and its subtypes on non-contrast CT (NCCT) head studies and to compare the effects of various preprocessing and model design implementations. The DL algorithm was trained and externally validated on open-source, multi-centre retrospective data containing radiologist-annotated NCCT head studies. The training dataset was sourced from four research institutions across Canada, the USA and Brazil. The test dataset was sourced from a research centre in India. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was used, with its performance compared against similar models with additional implementations: (1) a recurrent neural network (RNN) attached to the CNN, (2) preprocessed CT image-windowed inputs and (3) preprocessed CT image-concatenated inputs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and microaveraged precision (mAP) score were used to evaluate and compare model performances. The training and test datasets contained 21,744 and 491 NCCT head studies, respectively, with 8,882 (40.8%) and 205 (41.8%) positive for intracranial haemorrhage. Implementation of preprocessing techniques and the CNN-RNN framework increased mAP from 0.77 to 0.93 and increased AUC-ROC [95% confidence intervals] from 0.854 [0.816-0.889] to 0.966 [0.951-0.980] (p-value = 3.91 × 10-12). The deep learning model accurately detected intracranial haemorrhage and improved in performance following specific implementation techniques, demonstrating clinical potential as a decision support tool and an automated system to improve radiologist workflow efficiency. • The deep learning model detected intracranial haemorrhages on computed tomography with high accuracy. • Image preprocessing, such as windowing, plays a large role in improving deep learning model performance. • Implementations which enable an analysis of interslice dependencies can improve deep learning model performance. • Visual saliency maps can facilitate explainable artificial intelligence systems. • Deep learning within a triage system may expedite earlier intracranial haemorrhage detection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 74%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 19 83%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#22,030,845
of 24,579,850 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology Experimental
#210
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,953
of 403,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology Experimental
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,850 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.