↓ Skip to main content

Safety concerns and hidden agenda behind HPV vaccines: another generation of drug-dependent society?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 174)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
141 tweeters
facebook
39 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Safety concerns and hidden agenda behind HPV vaccines: another generation of drug-dependent society?
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40169-016-0126-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahin Khatami

Abstract

Analyses of data and hidden agenda behind repeated failed outcomes of cancer research and therapy, status of American health, safety concerns for HPV vaccines and future research considerations are summarized in this commentary. A closer look at cancer science reveals that highly power structure (system) in medical establishment vs. anti-system and chaos in cancer research ('medical/scientific ponzi schemes') is potent recipe for failed therapeutics that kills patients but generates huge corporate profit. American health status ranks last among other developed nations despite the highest amount that USA invests in healthcare. This is a wake-up call to make sure that the evil part of human being does not prevent the health services that the public deserves. Otherwise, 'it does not matter how many resources you have, if you don't know, or don't want to know, how to use them, they will never be enough'. Answer to cancer and improved public health is possible only by switching the current corruptive and abusive culture of 'who you know' to a culture of 'what you know'. Policy makers and professionals in decision making roles are urged to return to common sense and logics that our Forefathers used to serve the public.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Student > Master 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Unspecified 2 17%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#130,011
of 13,255,689 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#3
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,636
of 373,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,255,689 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.