↓ Skip to main content

Opportunities lost: Nih research funding to New York's Medical Schools

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Opportunities lost: Nih research funding to New York's Medical Schools
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, March 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02350964
Authors

Lawrences Sturman, Martin D. Sorin, Randall J. Hannum

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#3,628,325
of 12,497,040 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#449
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,563
of 363,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,497,040 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.