Title |
3D technologies for intangible cultural heritage preservation—literature review for selected databases
|
---|---|
Published in |
Heritage Science, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40494-021-00633-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska, Marek Milosz, Pawel Powroznik, Edyta Lukasik |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 237 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 22 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 9% |
Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
Researcher | 15 | 6% |
Lecturer | 11 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 11% |
Unknown | 125 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 23 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 16 | 7% |
Computer Science | 15 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
Design | 10 | 4% |
Other | 31 | 13% |
Unknown | 131 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,340,838
of 23,515,785 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#157
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,549
of 512,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.