↓ Skip to main content

Field observations on the feeding behavior of salps (Tunicata: Thaliacea)

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, January 1974
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Field observations on the feeding behavior of salps (Tunicata: Thaliacea)
Published in
Marine Biology, January 1974
DOI 10.1007/bf00389262
Authors

L. P. Madin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
Brazil 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Tunisia 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 59%
Environmental Science 9 18%
Unspecified 4 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2000.
All research outputs
#3,500,514
of 12,226,093 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#702
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,939
of 335,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#18
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.