| Title |
Plant growth promoting bacteria and humic substances: crop promotion and mechanisms of action
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40538-017-0112-x |
| Authors |
Fábio Lopes Olivares, Jader Galba Busato, Alessandra M. de Paula, Lívia da Silva Lima, Natália Oliveira Aguiar, Luciano Pasqualoto Canellas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 186 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 10% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 62 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,718,144
of 23,468,283 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#32
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,752
of 442,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,468,283 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them