↓ Skip to main content

Using paper pulp poultices in the field and laboratory to analyse salt distribution in building limestones

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Using paper pulp poultices in the field and laboratory to analyse salt distribution in building limestones
Published in
Heritage Science, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40494-016-0110-5
Authors

Isabel Egartner, Oliver Sass

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 4 11%
Engineering 4 11%
Materials Science 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 10 27%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#13,127,401
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#246
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,844
of 415,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.