↓ Skip to main content

Radiation-induced fibrosarcoma after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer: a case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Radiation-induced fibrosarcoma after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer: a case report and literature review
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40792-023-01629-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideko Hoshina, Kouichi Kubouchi, Yutaka Tsutsumi, Hiroyuki Takei

Abstract

Radiation-induced sarcoma (RIS) has a 10-year incidence of 0.2-0.27% and a poor prognosis, although the radiation should need for breast-conserving surgery. In particular, radiation-induced fibrosarcoma has been rarer, and its incidence is 2.6-3.7% of RIS. A 43-year-old woman with pT1N1M0 breast cancer underwent breast-conserving surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy 8 years ago, and continued hormonal therapy. She complained of a hard unprotruded mass palpated in her right upper outer quadrant of breast. Although we suspected local recurrence, core needle biopsy revealed atypical spindled tumor cells without mammary or epithelial markers. A diagnosis of fibrosarcoma was made via tumorectomy. She underwent additional enlarged surgery. We report a rare case of fibrosarcoma in breast after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Fibrosarcoma after radiation therapy for breast cancer has been reported in 30 cases, including the present case. The dead and alive cases were not significantly different in terms of age, primary breast cancer, radiation dose, and following months. Patients with breast masses after radiation therapy should be suspected local recurrence and RIS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%