↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of Wind Erosion over a Heritage Site: A Case Study of Yongling Mausoleum, China

Overview of attention for article published in Built Heritage, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Prediction of Wind Erosion over a Heritage Site: A Case Study of Yongling Mausoleum, China
Published in
Built Heritage, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/bf03545718
Authors

Xiaoyu Wang, Jinzhu Meng, Tianwei Zhu, Jingyu Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 36%
Unspecified 2 18%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,755,938
of 23,575,882 outputs
Outputs from Built Heritage
#7
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,910
of 461,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Built Heritage
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them