Title |
Phytochemical screening and anticancer activity of the aerial parts extract of Xanthium strumarium L. on HepG2 cancer cell line
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Phytoscience, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40816-021-00252-w |
Authors |
Hai Trieu Ly, Trieu Minh Truong, Thi Thu Huong Nguyen, Hoang Dung Nguyen, Yuxia Zhao, Van Minh Le |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 13% |
Chemistry | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,334,208
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#11
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,699
of 505,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.