| Title |
Development of room-temperature curing aqueous emulsion-type acrylic adhesive I: effect of monomer composition on the initial adhesive strength
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, February 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10086-003-0610-2 |
| Authors |
Atsushi Mori, Kazuhisa Tashiro, Kyoko Makita, Masahiro Takatani, Tadashi Okamoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 27% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,698,055
of 23,416,487 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#61
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,194
of 143,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,416,487 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them