| Title |
Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental and Resource Economics, June 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1011128332243 |
| Authors |
Richard T. Carson, Nicholas E. Flores, Norman F. Meade |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 672 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 2% |
| United States | 9 | 1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| Ghana | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 1% |
| Unknown | 622 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 141 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 141 | 21% |
| Researcher | 92 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 109 | 16% |
| Unknown | 108 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 185 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 114 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 51 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 33 | 5% |
| Other | 92 | 14% |
| Unknown | 141 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#968,829
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#40
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#542
of 42,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them