| Title |
Efficacy of carbapenem vs non carbapenem β-lactam therapy as empiric antimicrobial therapy in patients with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales urinary septic shock: a propensity-weighted multicenter cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-023-01106-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erwann Cariou, Romain Griffier, Arthur Orieux, Stein Silva, Stanislas Faguer, Thierry Seguin, Saad Nseir, Emmanuel Canet, Arnaud Desclaux, Bertrand Souweine, Kada Klouche, Olivier Guisset, Jerome Pillot, Walter Picard, Tahar Saghi, Pierre Delobel, Didier Gruson, Renaud Prevel, Alexandre Boyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 22% |
| Colombia | 1 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 11% |
| Peru | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,805,825
of 25,054,594 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#368
of 1,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,511
of 409,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,054,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.