Title |
A global meta-analysis of woody plant responses to elevated CO2: implications on biomass, growth, leaf N content, photosynthesis and water relations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecological Processes, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13717-022-00397-7 |
Authors |
Mthunzi Mndela, Julius T. Tjelele, Ignacio C. Madakadze, Mziwanda Mangwane, Igshaan M. Samuels, Francuois Muller, Hosia T. Pule |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,073,929
of 24,889,544 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#10
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,875
of 422,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,889,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them