↓ Skip to main content

Metallic allergy requiring removal of iliac stent: report of a case

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Metallic allergy requiring removal of iliac stent: report of a case
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40792-020-00843-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsushi Guntani, Eisuke Kawakubo, Ryosuke Yoshiga, Shinsuke Mii

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 50%
Student > Postgraduate 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,857,708
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#93
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,081
of 378,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.