↓ Skip to main content

Comment on: “exercise training and cardiac autonomic function following coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis”

Overview of attention for article published in The Egyptian Heart Journal, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Comment on: “exercise training and cardiac autonomic function following coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis”
Published in
The Egyptian Heart Journal, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s43044-023-00344-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Oliveira Gois, Lino Sergio Rocha Conceição, Alana Lalucha de Andrade Guimarães, Vitor Oliveira Carvalho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from The Egyptian Heart Journal
#77
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,729
of 427,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Egyptian Heart Journal
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.