| Title |
An immunochromatographic test strip for rapid detection of fish pathogen Edwardsiella tarda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioresources and Bioprocessing, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40643-015-0047-7 |
| Authors |
Hesong Liu, Yue Wang, Jingfan Xiao, Qiyao Wang, Qin Liu, Yuanxing Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,711,992
of 23,454,152 outputs
Outputs from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#28
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,965
of 265,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,454,152 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.