| Title |
Delayed-onset contact dermatitis caused by olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution: effect of wiping off the remaining drug solution in two cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JA Clinical Reports, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40981-023-00604-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kasumi Boki Yamamoto, Keisuke Fujii, Kazuhiro Mizumoto, Tadashi Tanioku, Tomoyuki Kawamata |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,923,090
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#87
of 210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,871
of 411,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.