↓ Skip to main content

Subsurface structure identification at the blind prediction site of ESG6 based on the earthquake-to-microtremor ratio method and diffuse field concept for earthquakes

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Subsurface structure identification at the blind prediction site of ESG6 based on the earthquake-to-microtremor ratio method and diffuse field concept for earthquakes
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40623-023-01791-x
Authors

Fumiaki Nagashima, Hiroshi Kawase, Kenichi Nakano, Eri Ito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,991,575
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#765
of 1,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,737
of 426,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#28
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.