↓ Skip to main content

The use of ‘poisonous insecticidal solutions’ in bookbinding: coping with historic pesticide treatments in the archive

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The use of ‘poisonous insecticidal solutions’ in bookbinding: coping with historic pesticide treatments in the archive
Published in
Heritage Science, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40494-023-00866-y
Authors

Lora V. Angelova, Sadat Nawaz, Barbara Kafadaroğlu, Boaz Paz, Francisco Moreta, Helen Woollaston, Marc Vermeulen, Juergen Vervoorst

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,835,143
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#329
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,989
of 344,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.